Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coolhunting


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep.  MBisanz  talk 22:08, 22 November 2008 (UTC)

Coolhunting

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No sources, this has probably sat around long enough. This looks like nothing more than an attempt to define a neologism. Inline lilnks make it look like possibly a clever advert. Crossmr (talk) 11:17, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep I normally vote to delete neologisms, but from the links provided in the article, it seems that this is a notable, if new, term for an entire industry. This means the article meets the notability guidelines and should be kept. Theseeker4 (talk) 16:12, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Seems notable unless an appropriate merge target can be identified. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:48, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Advertising-related deletion discussions.   -- Raven1977 (talk) 22:25, 18 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. It's not a neologism that was invented on Wikipedia.  It's been around for at least ten years, occasionally you see some buzz about it in the New York Times.  It looks like we have references, just this article needs to work them into an encyclopedic tone. Squidfryerchef (talk) 03:44, 21 November 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.