Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooltempo Records


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Tone 19:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Cooltempo Records

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, fails GNG/WP:NCORP  HighKing++ 13:28, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:36, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 20:04, 12 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep - The article currently has no sources but the record label has received some minor media notice that may qualify for a stub article under WP:NCOMPANY. The label has earned a certain "cult" status and its recent resurrection earned a little media notice:, . However I would not dispute any calls for more evidence of notability. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 20:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep: this was a really well known label on the British music scene during the 1980s and 1990s, licensing many of the early US hip hop and electro/house singles for release in the UK, as well as developing homegrown R&B acts. Many of its singles and albums made the top ten in the UK, and it's certainly had in-depth coverage in Billboard for starters:, . The label had its own distinct identity and as a result I would expect further print coverage in UK magazines like Music Week. Richard3120 (talk) 21:11, 12 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Agree with, certainly needs references but label has enough notability and coverage. Rocktober2018 (talk) 22:12, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per  DOOMSDAYER 520 .  NNADI GOOD LUCK  ( Talk &#124; Contribs ) 14:42, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.