Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooperation quotient

Cooperation quotient was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was delete

This seems like independent research/created term. Google search excluding most mirrors doesn't yield many results. No clear definition how one comes to this theoretical quotient other than that ""it is difficult". Has been on cleanup for >2 months. rhyax 05:27, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Delete. This is more original research from Quickwik.  I thought we'd cleaned it all up back in May.  Must have missed this one. Rossami 15:37, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - original research - T&#949;x  &#964;  ur&#949;  17:02, 8 Sep 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - original research, and jargon at that. Pyrop 02:13, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research, neologism.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 20:47, 11 Sep 2004 (UTC)