Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooperative Research Centre for Advanced Composite Structures


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Cooperative Research Centre. (non-admin closure)  Onel 5969  TT me 19:36, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Cooperative Research Centre for Advanced Composite Structures

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Promotion of defunct non-notable organization; at minimum, upmerge with Cooperative Research Centre. fgnievinski (talk) 04:15, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:24, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: I'd like some discussion about why this should not be kept.
 * Merge or redirect to Cooperative Research Centre. This is an obvious alternative to deletion, I'm not sure why this had to come to AfD. Deus et lex (talk) 04:30, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Comment - I am comfortable with keeping this article and agree with Mccapra that the promotional argument is not correct given that the organisation is defunct. Deus et lex (talk) 23:20, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep if the organisation is defunct I don’t see how the article can be promotional. There seems to be enough substance here for a stand alone article. If consensus says otherwise then merge and redirect. Mccapra (talk) 07:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:41, 11 January 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Vaticidalprophet (talk) 08:41, 19 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect as suggested. Right now, there are no secondary sources in the article. If it truly is defunct, it is unlikely that there would be a retrospective. A redirect is cheap. Therefore, let's move the whole thing there. A smerge is acceptable. Bearian (talk) 21:59, 25 January 2021 (UTC)!
 * Redirect makes sense in this case.  HighKing++ 12:29, 29 January 2021 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Cooperative Research Centre where it is listed as a past program – Epinoia (talk) 16:34, 30 January 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.