Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coopersale Halt railway station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Per consensus, we will consider this a soft delete without prejudice to re-creation if the station is actually ever built. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:54, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Coopersale Halt railway station

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

(Reason given by nominator: Station never existed & no published plans either) 109.154.43.47 (talk) 18:15, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable enough, although (as noted elsewhere) it should more properly be called something other than a “Station”. Useddenim (talk) 00:20, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - there's no station here according to the EOR's website. Lamberhurst (talk) 15:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Procedural close. The steps at WP:AFDHOWTO part II were not followed; in particular, the nominator has not given a valid reason for deletion. This means that the page is not recognised as an AFD by bots, and so is not showing at either Articles for deletion/Log/2014 April 22 (when the article was tagged) or at Articles for deletion/Log/2014 April 23 (when this page was created). -- Red rose64 (talk) 20:48, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I've added the to the top of this page on behalf of the person who  the  to the article; this should cause the bots to pick it up. Timestamp is copied from that edit. The nominator still needs to provide a valid reason for deletion, per WP:DELETE: I cannot fill it in for them, since [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Coopersale_Halt_railway_station&dir=prev&offset=20140422175906&limit=3&action=history their edit summaries] leave no clue. -- Red rose64 (talk) 19:39, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Is it not possible to reproduce verbatim the reasoning given on the talk page of the article in question? Lamberhurst (talk) 20:52, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - There is no station or published plans for one. The text in the page also has many errors, e.g. it claims there is a station. Mere speculation of a station is no basis for an article. See also talk page of above article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.85.176.40 (talk) 13:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 April 24.  — cyberbot I  Notify Online 19:56, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice to recreation - as the Epping Ongar Railway article states (and from personal experience), there is no Coopersale Halt. no objection to recreation iff a halt is built. Mjroots (talk) 23:07, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:03, 26 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete without prejudice to recreate. It doesn't seem this is or was an actual station.  If it turns out it is, was or will be, then it can be recreated.--Oakshade (talk) 06:08, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete without prejudice to recreate – it never existed, so it may not be notable, but something may be built in the future. Epicgenius (talk) 18:38, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.