Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooroll Mills


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 13:05, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

Cooroll Mills

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Pure gobbledygook. None of the sources I checked so much as mentions a "cooroll mill". The only Google Scholar hit for that combination of words was a "booklet for parents of young children with special needs" which doesn't seem relevant to the topic at hand. Huon (talk) 21:25, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Unable to locate any reliable sources, or really any sources at all, talking about this topic. APerson (talk!) 21:30, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. What even is this? &mdash; kikichugirl  oh hello! 21:31, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete – The author(?)'s Wikipedia page is here, in German. But I have to say that both the content and the references are way over my head. Unless someone from WikiProject Mathematics can translate it for us laymen, I don't think anyone is going to understand it. – Margin1522 (talk) 22:08, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - From a physics perspective, this is FRINGE at best, and utter gibberish at worst. For example, the sentence "It is constructed as a solid ball with a Schwarzschild radius" makes no sense because everything has a Schwarzschild radius (technically speaking), and other phrases/wikilinks make me think the author is simply trying to MASK the ridiculousness of the premise of creating "rollers" the size of atoms. I would go on, but Huon's summary is sufficient for the purposes of this discussion. Primefac (talk) 23:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: This article seems to be gibberish, because it is completely impossible to determine what is being described, a physical apparatus of some sort, or a thought-experiment. This article is cited in the German page in relation to her work on GUT (theory of everything), which would be theoretical physics. The pronunciation, or origin of "cooroll" is also a mystery. Imaginatorium (talk) 18:12, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:50, 24 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - If it's not mentioned in the sources, it must be some kind of elaborate hoax. Liam987  (talk)  22:16, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - the author of the draft left a note at my talk page that apparently was meant for the deletion discussion. I stand by my original assessment. Huon (talk) 21:59, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: that note clarifies what was already obvious -- that the article author is the same "Gudrun Kalmbach H.E." who wrote most of the references (in journals of dubious quality). A serious WP:COI, in other words. -- 120.17.0.71 (talk) 00:44, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete as utterly non-notable FRINGE physics. -- 120.17.0.71 (talk) 00:51, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.