Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cootie's Bar


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 03:38, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Cootie&

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

non-notable flash video games from a defunct site Rapido (talk) 13:55, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for these flash games. Joe Chill (talk) 15:49, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete While I appreciate the author's work in terms of creating and expanding these articles on flash games, this game does not appear to be notable and their arguments on the talkpage seem mostly centered on WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS with the comparative article being one they wrote.-- Terrillja talk  16:01, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 16:26, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete doesn't appear notable. Eeekster (talk) 01:15, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep The website given is not defunct and links to the games themselves, therefore supporting the article. These games were (and still are) quite popular.  Just because some people may not have heard of them doesn't mean it is not notable.  I have already been through this with another nomination on this article and I was successful there, why can't this just be dropped and leave the article alone?  If you don't like it, dont read it.  You can always improve on the article if you think it's not been written too well as with any other article.  Why has this been nominated twice in the space of a couple of days, within minutes of the article being created?????--Cexycy (talk) 01:34, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Your comments never work in AfD because they completely ignore WP:N. When the AfDs are closed, your comments won't mean anything to the closing admin. Joe Chill (talk) 01:39, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * What is that supposed to mean? --Cexycy (talk) 02:14, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It means that AfDs are based on guidelines. Joe Chill (talk) 02:15, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It is quite normal for a deletion debate to be started if the speedy delete request was refused. When an administrator declines a speedy delete it just means that he or she thinks the article should not be deleted out of hand without a debate. It does not mean the admin thought the article should not be deleted at all.  Sp in ni  ng  Spark  02:26, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * What part of the guidelines have been violated here anyway? How is this article about a non-notable issue?  Who can say if it is or not?  --Cexycy (talk) 02:38, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The guideline is at WP:N, as has already been pointed out to you several times. It says If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article. It is up to you to find the reliable sources that say that.  No reliable sources is grounds for deletion under the verifiability policy.  Sp in ni  ng  Spark  02:56, 27 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete - We don't even need to go so far as the notability guideline; the subject doesn't appear to be even verifiable. A handful of web search hits, none of which are usuable. Marasmusine (talk) 12:53, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: No coverage in reliable sources, fails WP:WEB and WP:N. I appreciate that Cexycy is eager to create articles, but they would survive better if subjects were chosen with an eye towards satisfying WP:RS, WP:V and the appropriate notability guidelines as a prerequisite.    Ravenswing  14:33, 27 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.