Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cop on the edge


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the discussion was delete. Mailer Diablo 15:45, 12 July 2006 (UTC)

Cop on the edge
Nomination inspired by the corresponding AfD on One good cop. Vaguely characterized subject. No sources makes this unverified original research despite appreciable amount of work put into it. Opabinia regalis 05:02, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Seems to violate WP:NOR per nom, but I would be open to hearing arguments against this position and will change my mind if someone can explain why it's not Original Research. Alphachimp   talk  06:50, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:OR. As it stands right now, it's OR.  A nice term paper for a film class, but not WP.  Tychocat 09:37, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Tychocat. --DaveG12345 10:29, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. -- Kungfu Adam ( talk ) 15:45, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- Alias Flood 16:27, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom ....(Complain)(Let us to it pell-mell) 00:15, 8 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.