Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copiun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete.  Sandstein  23:26, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Copiun

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

Not enough coverage to make this company significant. No indication why they are important. Probable WP:G11. &mdash; Timneu22 · &#32; talk 19:50, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 21:01, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Pure advertising; this business offers an enterprise-class software solution for distributed PC and laptop data management, backup, storage and search....  No indication that this one is technically, historically, or culturally significant among the hundreds of similar products. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 02:32, 9 November 2010 (UTC)

I'm going to make changes as there are significant differentiators that are noteworthy. For starters, 2 patents are pending: 1 for object-based deduplication where data commonality across enterprise PCs is reduced 3-5x more aggressively than current state-of-the-art block-based technologies. The second involves groundbreaking technology that enables a mobile user to communicate a backup to a corporate data center without creating a VPN or or having to have firewall ports opened. Aside from these differentiators, it's curious to me why others are deemed noteworthy, significant, or important yet they lack references, they are basic descriptions, or otherwise run-of-the-mill. My examples include Backup4all, Disco (software), Druva Software, Druva Insync, and Langmeier Backup. Comments are more than welcome. Scottb1010 (talk) 16:13, 9 November 2010 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:10, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment If you think they don't fit Wikipedia's standards, please tag them accordingly. They mightn't have been noticed yet. This isn't Pokemon - we can't catch 'em all... Not at first, anyway. Personally, I am allergic to 'solutions' (I saw a van the other day with 'Cleaning Solutions' on it - I thought, OK, must mean ammonia, Flash, caustic soda... but it didn't), and heartily dislike offers (on a plate?) but if you're doing a revamp I'll hold back to give you a chance. You could do to explain what this gizmo does that others don't (and in fact what it does do for the benefit of the less cloud conscious) while you're at it. Peridon (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   06:46, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Delete basically per Ihcoyc; it doesn't seem to have gotten any attention from reliable sources, and doesn't stand out from the hundreds of others like it. The Blade of the Northern Lights  ( 話して下さい ) 14:25, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.