Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coponius


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. The nominator is reminded to do a WP:BEFORE preceeding an AFD nomination. Liz Read! Talk! 19:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Coponius

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Almost no sources, nowhere close to meeting WP:GNG Serrwinner (talk) 13:14, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2024 March 18.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 13:39, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians, History, Israel, Palestine,  and Italy. Skynxnex (talk) 13:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep - One of a series of notable Romans being nominated for deletion by this edtor. See my comments at Articles for deletion/Gessius Florus. Undoubtedly notable. Treated in many books (e.g. ). Scholar has nearly 2000 articles to sort through, many/most being relevant. This should be a snow keep. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 14:01, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * A lot of articles have been deleted that I might consider 'undoubtably' notable, (Tristan Tate). Yet if they don't pass WP:GNG they should be deleted. Serrwinner (talk) 14:20, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep, pointless nom, no WP:BEFORE attempt, and regarding the "Almost no sources" rationale, the article is mostly based on the "Coponius" entry in The Jewish Encyclopedia and on A History of the Jewish People, Harvard University Press, two sources that speak volumes about Coponius' notability. The only excuse for the nominator is that they are a fairly new account with about 300 edits, otherwise I would consider them to be openly disruptive. --Cavarrone 19:45, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Improper nomination. TulsaPoliticsFan (talk) 22:32, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly notable as governor of Judaea, and one about whom at least some detail is known, making it less practical to merge him into an article about other governors.  P Aculeius (talk) 23:41, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Clearly notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Keep per  User talk:Serrwinner, this is a pointy nomination of a clearly notable subject. FortunateSons (talk) 14:06, 19 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.