Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copperstone University


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Per WP:SKCRIT. No one is challenging that this is a university, and therefore inherently meets WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, regardless of the state of the article (which has been improved). (non-admin closure) Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Copperstone University

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not enough citing, seems self promotional Flawedaddiction (talk) 05:55, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2016 April 21.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 06:14, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep - as a university it is notable as per WP:UNIGUIDE. It exists - as per the Ministry of Education website. Not enough citing is not enough unfortunately to delete Gbawden (talk) 08:30, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep: WP:PEACOCK is not an argument relevant to notability. You can always be bold and re-write it with sources... —Brigade Piron (talk) 09:59, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep. We wouldn't dream of deleting an article about an officially recognised university in the anglophone West, so why should we do so for one in Zambia? 86.17.222.157 (talk) 12:28, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep it is a university that exists. It is recognize to exist by the government. This is way above minimum notability thresholds.John Pack Lambert (talk) 02:06, 24 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.