Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copprome Orphanage


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Nominator withdraws AfD as per discussion below.--Technopat (talk) 10:14, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Copprome Orphanage

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails notablity (WP:ORG): "An organization is generally considered notable if it has been the subject of significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources." Technopat (talk) 23:01, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:26, 19 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000(talk) 05:26, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep per WP:NGO, added sources with "significant coverage in reliable, independent secondary sources". -- Green Cardamom (talk) 18:53, 19 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep. My initial reaction on seeing the nomination was to delete, but Cardamom has a point--there seems to be enough coverage that the case can be made to keep.  The Blue Canoe  03:54, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep. As the proposer of this AfD, and following Cardamom's addition of sources, am now convinced that it is notable. The page had previously had a multiple issues tag up for a month without any of said issues having been addressed.--Technopat (talk) 09:56, 24 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.