Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coptosia gianassoi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was withdraw. It exists under a different name than what was on the article which I was not aware of. (non-admin closure) Blaze The Wolf &#124; Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 13:09, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Coptosia gianassoi

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Relies entirely on 1 source, has no categories, and a google search on brings up about 100 results, most of which appear to be based off of Wikipedia or are UGC Blaze The Wolf &#124; Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 19:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Blaze The Wolf &#124; Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 19:09, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

(always happy to be able to use this :)
 * a)
 * b) present in multiple databases as a synonym of Phytoecia gianassoi (+ BioLib), to which name it should be moved (and lack of cats has never had any impact on AfD). -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:42, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Original description :
 * Reclassification :
 * So what I'm saying is - withdraw? -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 20:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh ok. I was not aware of the synonym as I only did a google search on the article name, not aware there was another name. I will actually move the article to the appropriate name after withdrawing. Blaze The Wolf &#124; Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 13:07, 14 May 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.