Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copyleft art


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, due to the lack of reliable sources to verify the article or establish notability. Davewild (talk) 21:43, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Copyleft art

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested PROD. Can't find a verifiable definition or notable mention of the subject anywhere. Jimmi Hugh (talk) 11:21, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment Note that the "contested prod" referred by the nominator was strictly procedural. I had removed the PROD simply because there was no reason provided in the PROD template. I have no opinion about the subject matter or the article. --Bardin (talk) 11:36, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't see any notability here. The article simply appears to be a personal essay on some subtopic of copyleft. --/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 11:50, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions.   -- --/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 11:52, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, no sources reliable or otherwise. WillOakland (talk) 18:48, 4 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.