Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Copyright on religious works


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  07:54, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

Copyright on religious works

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

There is reason to believe that the intersection of copyright law and religious texts is notable (e.g. ), but as this article stands, it is entirely WP:OR and WP:SYNTH and would have to be rewritten in its entirety to fit how reliable sources discuss the topic. –LaundryPizza03 ( d c̄ ) 07:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law and Religion. –LaundryPizza03 ( d  c̄ ) 07:52, 20 July 2023 (UTC)


 * Delete - I expected something sophisticated but there is nothing like that here. Centralknights (talk) 09:02, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete OR or SYNTH, but it's not really discussed in sources I find. Oaktree b (talk) 13:04, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete:  Agree with the nom and others above, a blantant violation of WP:OR/WP:SYNTH. At best, a case of WP:TNT. Sal2100 (talk) 20:59, 20 July 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.