Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coraline Ada Ehmke


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep.  So Why  07:43, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Coraline Ada Ehmke
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Lacks Notability, Vanity Article CamelMike (talk) 19:35, 30 May 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Plenty of sourcing to meet the WP:GNG. GorillaWarfare (talk) 19:45, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete . There are two or three reliable sources in there, but there's still the notability problem.  Creation history and tone seem promotional.  Also the article refers to its subject by first name.  --Lockley (talk) 18:33, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * The first point is a fair reason to delete an article, so I won't argue it; but it's silly to argue an article should be deleted for the rest of those reasons when they could be easily fixed. GorillaWarfare (talk) 00:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Y'know what, I'm going to stay out of this particular conversation. --Lockley (talk) 07:21, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947(c) (m) 23:59, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  04:39, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  04:40, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   08:06, 6 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per GorillaWarfare. Ckoerner (talk) 03:48, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * To expand as I was editing via mobile earlier. There are 17 inline citations to reliable sources in the article and multiple unused sources in Google News. I addressed first name concern. Ckoerner (talk) 22:13, 12 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.