Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coravin (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I'm withdrawing this on the basis of the NYT article, but I hope will continue removing promotional content, such as the quotations.  DGG ( talk ) 04:23, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Coravin
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

totally non-noable product and company. Minor promotional and consumer complaint references only  DGG ( talk ) 09:54, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep. Article is referenced from a variety of publications, only one of which strikes me as a bit dubious (Entrepreneur, now used only to reference history of the business); the NYT, FT, WSJ vetted blog, and La Revue du vin de France items are all about the company's product. This constitutes adequate evidence of notability. Yngvadottir (talk) 12:47, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 14:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm withdrawing this on the basis of the NYT article by their wine columnist, Eric Asimov.  DGG ( talk ) 00:25, 27 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.