Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corbett Keeling


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 02:01, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

Corbett Keeling

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to completely lack reliable sources & notable mentions/discussion in respected publications in any manner (there's a paywalled FT article which does not (according to title and a degree of assumption) confer notability). Created by COI/SPA. Article seems promotional in nature, not encyclopaedic. Rayman60 (talk) 01:35, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:02, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 04:40, 15 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- self-cited corporate spam on a subject with no indications of notability or significance. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:17, 18 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:18, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - run of the mill financial firm of some kind, but this Press release of a page is so poorly written that I can't figure out how it might be notable. Bearian (talk) 16:34, 18 January 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.