Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corbu (band)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) KSAWikipedian (talk) 01:05, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Corbu (band)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Although their work has some limited (key word being limited) coverage from The Guardian, EW and Interview Mag, not enough to satisfy WP:NBIO, WP:NBAND or WP:SIGCOV. A search suggests very little coverage available to help expand. >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 23:33, 17 August 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:14, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. >>  Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 23:33, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and New York. Shellwood (talk) 23:51, 17 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep as the references in the article are sufficient to pass WP:GNG with significant coverage in a devoted article in The Guardian one of the most reliable UK sources, also coverage in Entertainment Weekly and DIY mag. There is also coverage in The Times but it is paywalled, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 20:37, 24 August 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep Although it appears promotional, it apparently passes wp:GNG, has some fine references. Nythar T . C 07:46, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Coverage is not WP:SIGCOV and doesn't pass WP:NBAND. >> Lil-unique1  (  talk  ) — 13:25, 27 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Disagree, devoted full articles in The Guardian, Entertainment Weekly and DIY magazine are significant coverage and pass criteria 1 of WP:NMUSIC which is essentially WP:GNG, imv Atlantic306 (talk) 21:30, 29 August 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep Although the article needs some work, it shouldn't be deleted. Many of the references definitely pass WP:SIGCOV and appear to be reliable. I think it passes notability guidelines, as well. JML1148 (Talk &#124; Contribs) 00:37, 31 August 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.