Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cordell Francis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Secret account 19:21, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Cordell Francis

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Here we go again, folks. Another WP:SPA violating WP:AUTO and WP:COI while failing to live up to WP:MUSIC. Delete away. Qworty (talk) 02:36, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 04:23, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Being created by a single-purpose account is not a reason to delete an article. However, delete because of extreme conflict of interest. Also, having only eight friends on MySpace (one of which is "Tom") and a little over 400 profile views at the time of this writing indicates that Cordell Francis is not notable at this time. « D. Trebbien ( talk ) 17:38, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Vanity page, no sources given to verify that any of this is notable, no explanation given of what these 'awards' mean. r ʨ anaɢ talk/contribs 02:34, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete per nomination and the now seven friends on MySpace (Tom's still there). I wonder when he worked with Beyoncé  delirious  &amp;  lost  ☯ TALK  10:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.