Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cordiem


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was  Keep (non-admin close) RMHED (talk) 21:17, 24 May 2008 (UTC)

Cordiem

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This was tagged, validly, as an A7 speedy. However, on thinking about the fact that being formed by 9 major airlines and more, I thought we should have some checking done that this was not a minor, but nevertheless notable organisation while it existed. So here's an AfD. Splash - tk 23:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Has some article hits (e.g. ), but not many. Looks NN. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 23:28, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, minor folded organization, nothing more to see. Stifle (talk) 08:36, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.   -- Fabrictramp (talk) 22:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep, meets WP:CORP. I have taken the liberty of adding some references that should establish WP:N. No problem finding independent sources on the company, even if it five years since it went down the drain. Also in the light of the large companies involved in the establishment - this is no small enterprise, even if it seemed to fail. Arsenikk 22:33, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep Although no longer a viable company, it was historically notable by WP:CORP, it looks like to me. The added references make that clearer. Plvekamp (talk) 22:51, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The references added by Arsenikk are sufficient to show the article meets the notability guidelines.-- Kubigula (talk) 14:38, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep per the sources found and added by Arsenikk. –Black Falcon (Talk) 20:49, 24 May 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.