Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cordlife


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 01:58, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

Cordlife

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

While the company may be notable, this article reads like a press release and appears to be self-authored. Mattinbgn/talk 22:27, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and clean up. I like the sources, but I'm willing to overlook the obvious WP:COI to get it cleaned up. --Dennisthe2 23:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep -- A blood bank company on the Australian stock exchange with facilities in 3 countries is notable. Keesiewonder talk 16:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Splash - tk 17:48, 8 April 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep I think it needs expanding but I think its worth keeping --PrincessBrat 17:55, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep assuming they can find a single well known independent reliable source. if they are working on this scale there must be articles -- more independeent articles not based on their press releases. DGG 08:55, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep notable high-tech bio company. List of independant sources can be found here  --Vsion 03:50, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.