Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoreEL Technologies


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Jayjg (talk) 03:32, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

CoreEL Technologies

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Small company that lacks notability. Sources all appear to be either the company's website or press releases. Was speedy deleted earlier under G11. Eeekster (talk) 23:33, 26 December 2009 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 13:16, 28 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 15:08, 28 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. This is a technology company with businesses spread across Design Services and Product Development, Distribution and Training.  - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:49, 28 December 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment This is a technology company previously listed in wikipedia under the page heading H.264/MPEG-4 AVC products and implementations. The company has a H.264 Decoder IP core and all other companies listed on this page have a brief writeup on their products. It might be a good idea to provide details about this company as well since till a new page was started there was no information relating to it from the list of h.264 Decoders page. i am also the primary contributor for the article and am new to the rules of editing. Request you to kindly reconsider the nomination for deletionN.neeharika (talk) 03:56, 29 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.