Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Core Education & Technologies (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. – bradv  🍁  05:25, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Core Education & Technologies
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The Company has dissolved over a year back. The listing of article is causing confusion between people. There is no update on this article, in January the moderator has requested for updates but yet after 6 months there has been no updates. The company is not even listed on the NSE or BSE since 2015.

Request to delete the page as there is no update on this article since many years.

Thank. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nasha316 (talk • contribs) 05:45, June 13, 2019 (UTC)

There is no requirement that articles be up to date or that organisations are still going. Rathfelder (talk) 21:51, 15 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment This discussion page was created without the afd2 template and never transcluded to a daily log. Fixed now--I have no opinion on the nomination itself at this time.   If you wish to nominate other articles for deletion in the future, please fully follow the instructions at WP:AFDHOWTO when you do so.  Thank you. --Finngall talk  23:11, 25 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:47, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:47, 26 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 04:47, 26 July 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   13:42, 2 August 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: the article being out of date is a fixable issue and not a reason for deletion. However, the references are not compelling – many are spammy. I would say this should be closed with no prejudice against speedy renomination if a valid rationale is provided. – Teratix ₵ 03:46, 9 August 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   20:27, 9 August 2019 (UTC)


 * keep notability is not temporary, it is permanent; and AfD is not clean-up. If something from the article is confusing the readers, then try to resolve the issue. Post about it in relevant wikiprojects. By nominator's logic, we should delete Elvis Presley, Commodore International, and BlackBerry 10; because these legends ceased to exist. — usernamekiran (talk)  16:57, 14 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep I think the company just passes WP:CORP. I've updated the article a little bit, mostly using past tense throughout but also referencing a Forbes article about the company's troubles. I was unable to find the right reference that would allow us to say "the company went down at date XXXX" so I'm leaving the "update needed" template for now. Pichpich (talk) 23:17, 16 August 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.