Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coreo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR) NorthAmerica1000 18:05, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Coreo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I have not found a noticeable amount of notable secondary sources talking about this company. A company representative sometimes provides insights to editors of news websites, like here and here but the tone of such articles is sometimes promotional and, anyway, the fact that they publish statements by a representative of the company makes them primary sources. My research didn't find a good amount of them, the articles are rare and distributed over several years. I have not found any coverage in news, also (see here. From what I'm observing the company fails WP:COMPANY and I'm proposing the article for deletion so that a consensus can be reached. ► LowLevel (talk) 23:50, 8 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 03:43, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bahrain-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 03:44, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 03:44, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Although I might agree that Qatar Booming as unreliable source, I might however disagree with you on The Peninsula which is a Qatarian newspaper and Gulf News.--Mishae (talk) 04:48, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Mishae: Just to clarify, I was not assessing the reliability of the sources but stating that any exact quote of a statement of the company's CEO, like "since Coreo’s website is Qatar’s highest visited online real estate portal...", should be considered in my opinion a statement coming from a primary source (the company's CEO), not from a secondary source (the newspaper). ► LowLevel (talk) 05:09, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually, correct me if I am wrong, but primary sources is what we use for external links, not references.--Mishae (talk) 06:18, 12 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:14, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar ♔   03:34, 23 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.