Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coresystems


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (WP:NPASR). Of note is that the delete !vote following the nomination does not provide a guideline- or policy-based rationale for deletion. As such, closing as no consensus due to a lack of valid input in this discussion relative to the nomination. North America1000 00:18, 10 July 2015 (UTC)

Coresystems

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable company, fails WP:GNG and WP:CORP. Joseph2302 (talk) 22:03, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:14, 21 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  14:48, 25 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, JAaron95  &#40; Talk &#41;  15:22, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - a company that offers unspecified "solutions" is not inherently notable. . . Mean as custard (talk) 20:08, 2 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.