Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coretrust


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 15:16, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Coretrust

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

All (reliable) Sources are only inherited WP:INHERITORG, Notability not given in current state as being requested in WP:CORP CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:29, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep - I expanded my research and included additional sources that talk about Coretrust exclusively. They were all from notable sources:, , , and . -PLCO (talk) 09:23, 10 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Blocked for UPE. MER-C 14:20, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:29, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete All the coverage are trivial topics or lack depth. Including the new sources provided by PLCO. The last one in particular seems to be a local blog and the article is sponsored by the building development district anyway. So, it's completely not valid as a source. --Adamant1 (talk) 11:46, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete topic has accrued coverage, but does not meet WP:NCORP. Many of the sources cited are routine business announcements, notices of acquisitions, or press releases, all of which NCORP does not consider to confer notability. Also lacking is a credible claim to encyclopedic significance that shows how Coretrust is unique when compared to similar companies. SamHolt6 (talk) 15:56, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep Sources provided in the article pass WP:GNG. The references seem correct. They have extensive coverage in media, including LA Times and Fast Company, and own prime properties worth many billions in the US. After carefully reviewing their coverage on Fast Company, I can see this company is doing something unique - the concept of opening up a building for fresh air is what is needed in properties today. CalgaryPA 12:06, 12 June 2020 (PT)
 * Delete Sources provided seem to provide passing mentions. No demonstrated significance. Sounds like a case of WP:TOOSOON. Runforlimit505 (talk) 05:27, 13 June 2020 (UTC) Blocked sock. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 11:36, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - likely undisclosed paid-for spam. MER-C 14:20, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Leaving aside the UPE, not a single reference meets the criteria for establishing notability, all are based on interviews and company announcements/PR. Topic fails GNG/NCORP.  HighKing++ 21:59, 13 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.