Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corey Delaney (party boy)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Article is a recreation of a validly (and repeatedly) deleted article.. DJ Clayworth (talk) 14:04, 7 May 2008 (UTC)

Corey Delaney (party boy)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

16 to Aussie bad boys make big news with a AUD$2000 wild party in his parents home. But is he notable? Are we party dudes or squares ? Triwbe (talk) 11:14, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.   —Longhair\talk 11:17, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Can't we delete this article while we await the result of this deletion review? -- Mattinbgn\talk 11:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOBJ: "Wikipedia is not a news source: it takes more than just a short burst of news reports about a single event or topic to constitute evidence of sufficient notability. The Wikimedia project Wikinews covers topics of present news coverage." Frank  |  talk  11:57, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment stubbified as the negative claims lacked inline citations. Deletion review probably a more appropriate forum rather than evaluating the work of an apparent newbie. Andjam (talk) 12:05, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as recreation of a deleted article. Article has been created and then deleted in numerous other forms previously - see Administrators'_noticeboard/Corey_Delaney_discussion for details.  Possibly a CSD G4 even.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:10, 7 May 2008 (UTC).
 * Is G4 for previously deleted content, or is it for a previously deleted topic? Andjam (talk) 12:23, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Content, not topic. But the content doesn't seem to be markedly different from what I remember in the old articles.  There was also precedent last time around for speedying Corey Worthington as a G4 after Corey Delaney was deleted.  Either way I don't really mind, and I don't think the article is obnoxious enough in its present state to warrant a speedy if that speedy would be even slightly controversial.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:31, 7 May 2008 (UTC).
 * Additional note: the salting for the Worthington article states that "Controversy makes clear this should not be recreated without consensus to do so.." Given that the DRV for that article (per User:Mattinbgn above) seems to be heading for a no consensus at this early stage, I would assume that a consensus to create an article on this person does not exist at the present time.
 * Delete The page has been deleted I believe twice through AfD, and there is now an ongoing debate at deletion review to restore this article. Delete the article for now until the deletion is overturned. Wildthing61476 (talk) 13:40, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Fleeing notoreity. Anything useful can be in an article on the incident. DJ Clayworth (talk) 13:54, 7 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Corey Worthington is an international celebrity; that one event was just the beginning of his rise to fame and he has since then done a lot of things. There are plenty of articles about people on here who were only married to someone who wasn't at all notable or famous. Doesn't getting married count as a single event? It's pretty obvious that the only reason this was deleted is because some people don't like him. You can't possibly deny that he's a lot more worthy than other people with articles on here.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.