Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corneal Copulation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete, see WP:BOLLOCKS. NawlinWiki (talk) 05:39, 2 March 2009 (UTC)

Corneal Copulation

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article is entirely original research with no verifiable references available. Topic is about an unencylopedic neologism, most likely created as a joke by the creator of the article. Unfortunately, this article does not fall within any speedy deletion guidelines. – Dream out loud (talk) 04:57, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. WP:HOAX. It cites no sources, so it fails WP:RS and WP:N. &mdash;  Hello Annyong  (say whaaat?!) 05:01, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong delete, possibly could have been speedied as vandalism/hoax, but this will do. - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 05:02, 2 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.