Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornejo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 16:30, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Cornejo

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

fails WP:GNG; a single entry in a dictionary of every applicable surname (which is what the ancestry.com page is derived from) is not enough for notability. Ironholds (talk) 07:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge to Surname. The article Surname has an example of a surname formed from a parent's name, but no example for "surname based on a person's geographical origin", which is listed as one of the options in Surname. Supposing that the information in Cornejo is correct, it could be useful to include a trimmed version of the article as a section in Surname. --CronopioFlotante (talk) 09:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 12:46, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 12:46, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak delete. The topic does not seem particularly notable, making either merge or delete appropriate. The questionable nature of the sources (asserting that the name appears in historical documents?) makes me uncomfortable supporting a merge. I'm therefore leaning toward deletion. Cnilep (talk) 13:53, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.