Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornell Moderator


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. John Reaves (talk) 03:20, 22 March 2007 (UTC)

Cornell Moderator

 * – (View AfD) (View log)
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested prods. Unsourced articles about recently established not notable partisan college journals. Consensus tends to favour deletion or simple merge per WP:ORG. A summary of the most important details has now been incorporated into the Cornell University article. The remaining details may occasionally fail WP:SELF, and would be of less than passing interest to people outside the University. Ohconfucius 07:01, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - both the Moderator and the Centrist. There is not enough established notability to justify individual articles. The in-article mentions at this time are sufficient. Luke! 23:03, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.