Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cornell University Esbaran Amazon Field Laboratory


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:05, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

Cornell University Esbaran Amazon Field Laboratory

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Tagged for questionable notability since July 07, unreferenced, and could probably be merged into the main Cornell article if so desired. Wizardman 23:12, 24 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge/redirect to Cornell University . This is an unusual research programme. There is some coverage but not sufficient to stand up its own page. TerriersFan (talk) 14:55, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - I agree that Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences is a better merge target. TerriersFan (talk) 01:42, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions.  —TerriersFan (talk) 14:58, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Merge and rd as above. JJL (talk) 00:20, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge It's a shame I can't find any more useful sources on this, as it is a fascinating topic and I would love to read more about it. But I can't find enough to justify it as a separate article.  Cazort (talk) 00:44, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge Not notable enough on its own to merit its own article. --Cybercobra (talk) 03:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment Gbook hit, there are also lots of hits on local Peruvian sites (mostly tourism related), the problem with facilities like this is that most publications will come out in the name of the University or the major research department and not the field unit. This one is remarkable because it supports multiple departments. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 07:07, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment After reading over the main page for Cornell, I think this article would make that page (which in my opinion is already way too long) too long. I am thus changing my recommendation to a Keep on the grounds that, notable or not, keeping it as a sub-page would make that page more readable.  If someone wants to convince me to change my recommendation to a merge, I would recommend greatly reducing the size of the Cornell article, or finding a sub-page to merge to.  Cazort (talk) 13:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment how about redirecting it to Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, which appears to house it via the Plant Bio. dept., or to its director Eloy Rodriguez? JJL (talk) 15:14, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I think a Merge/Redirect to Cornell University College of Agriculture and Life Sciences would be great. Thanks for the suggestion.  Cazort (talk) 21:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redir to the above is in order.  Red  Skunk talk  06:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.