Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CoroCoro Comic (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. per WP:SK criterion 2.3. Renominating with the same rationale one week after the previous AfD was SNOW closed as keep most certainly fits the criterion. (non-admin closure) Tim Song (talk) 22:25, 17 September 2009 (UTC)

CoroCoro Comic
AfDs for this article: 
 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Failure to provide independent, reliable sources to establish notability. Kalium-39 (talk) 20:49, 17 September 2009 (UTC) — Kalium-39 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Delete per nominator. --207.160.233.153 (talk) 20:49, 17 September 2009 (UTC) —suspected sockpuppet of nominator as both accounts have edited the same articles.
 * Speedy keep per previous AFD. Agathoclea (talk) 20:56, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep as a bad faith nomination. This editor has nominated this article before under bad faith using now indefinitely banned account and has vandalized to articles about manga serialized in the magazine, Pokémon: The Electric Tale of Pikachu  and Pokémon Pocket Monsters under various IP accounts. —Farix (t &#124; c) 21:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions.  -- —Farix (t &#124; c) 21:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep- Sources were presented in the last AFD (which closed just over a week ago) that helped establish notability. I don't see anything thats changed between then and now. Umbralcorax (talk) 21:04, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep Good manners require at least one month between two AFD. That aside like in the previous Afd WP:V and WP:N are asserted. Furthermore there is a bunch of Anime News Network news mentioning that publication. --KrebMarkt 21:13, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Keep and ban the nominator. Doceirias (talk) 21:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete because it's unsourced. --70.247.249.17 (talk) 21:43, 17 September 2009 (UTC) — 70.247.249.17 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.  —suspected sockpuppet of nominator.
 * Keep. Even aside from procedural issues and other evidence provided during the first discussion, the magazine that initially serialized Doraemon and Pokémon, among other important works (including several winners of the Shogakukan Manga Award), is clearly notable in some way. —Quasirandom (talk) 22:03, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.