Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coromandel Cricket Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   - Keep - Peripitus (Talk) 12:49, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Coromandel Cricket Club

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Notability not established, club plays below national or state level. Fails WP:GROUP and, as individuals, WP:ATHLETE. WWGB (talk) 00:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  —WWGB (talk) 01:02, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions.  —WWGB (talk) 01:02, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 19:33, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. if 1862 establishment date can be referenced, will have some notability (Epistemos (talk) 11:01, 6 July 2009 (UTC)).
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep as a really old and surviving club as noted on an independent reliable source - local govt website. Aussie newspapers don't have online archives from even the 1990s, so it's going to be difficult to get other online sources. -SpacemanSpiff (talk) 05:56, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - I read the article as establishing notability, due to the age of the club. Rlendog (talk) 20:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. likely to be one of the oldest surviving cricket clubs in Australia = notable. –Moondyne 09:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.