Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CorpWatch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. ✗ plicit  14:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

CorpWatch

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

No sources on the article, no sources from a search. However, it is frequently used as a source, see Newspapers.com for example. Would like to see what others think. Sungodtemple (talk &#8226; contribs) 13:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Environment,  and California. Sungodtemple (talk &#8226; contribs) 13:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete: Unless we can find more sources about them, there doesn't seem to be enough to keep the article. This, then this brief mention Oaktree b (talk) 14:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * This ? Oaktree b (talk) 14:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unless more work has been done to it. Micheal Kaluba (talk) 13:06, 26 November 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.