Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirect  Corporate (film). Can be recreated when RS info about the film becomes available.--Salix (talk): 23:28, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Corporate 2

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:NFF states that, "Films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography should not have their own articles." The article has only one source which doesn't states anything about the filming progress. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 18:28, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:54, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 00:55, 6 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy redirect to Corporate (film). Any information can be added there until it becomes notable in its own right and passes WP:NFF.  Incidentally the only source is a casting rumour from 3 years ago, and a google search for "corporate sequel" only shows results from 2 years ago, so I wonder if this film is still on the cards.  --Rob Sinden (talk) 12:49, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect for now to Corporate (film). Currently available sources are not recent, and this film may be on hold. The redirect can be undone and the article expanded and sourced accordingly if/when it is shown as having begun pronciple filming.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 07:21, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.