Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate Armor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 20:33, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

Corporate Armor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of notability. Apart from press releases or posts by business partners, the only sources are a few mentions in the Charlotte Business Journal as e.g. one of the best places to work in the small business category. Nothing substantial, not the necessary indepth independent sourcing for an article. Fram (talk) 13:03, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as entirely advertorial with nothing actually convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  22:00, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of North Carolina-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:29, 5 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete -- insufficient sources to meet GNG and CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:49, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.