Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate abuse


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:27, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
 * One note, I'll be redirecting this to corporate scandal after deleting, several things link here and this might well be a useful search term. Sjakkalle (Check!)  08:29, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Corporate abuse
Was recommended for deletion before -- expansion never happened Salvor Hardin 19:58, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep as per the previous nomination. Could be redirected but not deleted (too many pages link to it). MyNam e IsNotBob  20:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Article says "This category has been inspired by an article written by the BBC: BBC NEWS | Business | Wall Street scandals at a glance" - i.e. it's original research. Reviewing the linked source, and the three external links, not one uses the term.  I'm sure that psychohistory can predict exactly when this term will become significant, but the article and linked sources indicate that the answer is: not yet. Just zis Guy you know? 21:52, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Blatant POV fork and OR. Sumahoy 01:43, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per JzG. -- ReyBrujo 21:11, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per JzG. Deltabeignet 01:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per JzG.Apollo 10:53, 9 May 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.