Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corporate strategy development method (second nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Chick Bowen 05:50, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Corporate strategy development method
Was orginally nominated for deletion, but nobody declared anything; relisting. User:SP-KP stated: ''I'm not entirely sure what this article [meaning Corporate_strategy_development_method, Sandstein] is about (I'm not even entirely sure I think it's an AFD candidate). However, it's at least in need of some contextualisation. Any views? SP-KP 22:07, 10 April 2006 (UTC)'' No vote.  K ilo-Lima|(talk) 14:27, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, seems to be a guide on company organization and structuring created by members of Method Engineering team of the University of Utrecht. Google only shows 2 results, both of which are from Wikipedia. -- T B C [[Image:Confused-tpvgames.gif|18px|]] ???  ???   ??? 14:37, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete all Corporate jargon--Zxcvbnm 14:41, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. People pay consultants thousands of dollars for advice like this. There are books on this topic in the business section of any bookstore. This appears to be more than Corporate Jargon, the page has useful information on it. george 15:44, 15 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete: seems like OR. If the Method Engineering team wants to publish their work online, perhaps they should look into Wikibooks or Wikiversity. --Hetar 07:07, 16 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, Wikipedia is not a free web host. Stifle (talk) 00:01, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.