Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corpsefucking Art


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

Corpsefucking Art
The result was DELETE Toddst1 (talk) 19:25, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Promotional text about a band of questionable notability. The article lists a seemingly impressive discography, but actually it seems that they have released two full-length albums on small indy labels. I do not think that this suffices for passing WP:MUSIC. B. Wolterding (talk) 18:14, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy DELETE, does not make a valid assertion of notability, nothing even remotely satisfying WP:MUSIC. Mister Senseless&trade; (Speak - Contributions) 18:21, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * comment - Just a note, but notability and WP:MUSIC is set apart from WP:CSD criteria. It's an assertion of importance, even the slightest bit. These AfD discussions are what determine notability.  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 19:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.   --  Wisdom89  ( T |undefined  /  C ) 19:05, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Agree with the A7 CSD. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 19:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment The speedy tag is in place on the article. JeremyMcCracken (talk) (contribs) 19:19, 6 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Just for the record, I did agree with the A7 : ) Wisdom89  ( T |undefined /  C ) 19:23, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.