Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corpsehump


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 02:20, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

Corpsehump

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Unsourced, non-notable neologism. Belongs in Wiktionary. Chevinki 01:10, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as nn neologism  semper fictilis 01:12, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. I'm not even sure it belongs in Wiktionary. — Pious7Talk Contribs 01:15, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Teabagging. FiggyBee 01:17, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unsourced and pointless. Bridgeplayer 04:38, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per all above. /Blaxthos 05:03, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete abject nonsense Guy (Help!) 14:06, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, doesn't belong here or in Wiktionary. Besides, it's called "skullfucking". Recury 14:51, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment why not just prod this thing? Hasn't been prodded before, nothing remotely controversial about this. --Xyzzyplugh 14:54, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Scienter 18:47, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and set the perps on fire. fails WP:NEO, WP:ATT.  Christ on a crutch, who in the hell felt it necessary for there to be an encyclopedia article on this subject?  Ravenswing 20:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Doesn't even belong in Wiktionary. --Seattle Skier (talk) 22:52, 22 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.