Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corpus Christi Monastery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was SPEEDY DELETED. &mdash; J I P | Talk 13:36, 31 October 2005 (UTC)

Corpus Christi Monastery
Needs to be deleted so Corpus christi monastery can be moved here. Alternatively, the quality of Corpus christi monastery may not be good enough to consider keeping around, but if it is indeed notable, as the article claims it to be, then it should be cleaned up under the new name. --Spring Rubber 01:53, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete both. This one because it has no content, and Corpus christi monastery because there is no claim to being notable other than the first Dominican monastery in the USA. Being old is not much of a claim to notability. &spades;DanMS 02:05, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - please note that AfD is not the place to take an article that should be deleted so that another article on the same topic can be moved to that space - that would be Requested moves. No vote. BD2412  T 02:14, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete this article under A3. It is merely a link to the Corpus christi monastery article. Part of the problem is that a substantial part of the Corpus christi article is a copyvio of the order's web page see with the contact details at the bottom. The article proposed to be moved needs a substantial cleanup. Capitalistroadster 02:17, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Comment - Actually, after further investigation, the entire Corpus christi article is a copyvio from different parts (home page and history) of the website. Should we speedy delete that article under copyvio and speedy delete this one under A3? --Spring Rubber 03:03, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * This one can be speedied under A3. However, as at least part of the article isn't from a commercial content provider but from the Monastery itself it will have to go through the normal process for AfD/copyvio. It would have to be nominated for deletion for AfD or listed as a copyvio. Capitalistroadster 03:27, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * All right, I'll speedy this one, but what do you recommend we do with the other one? Obviously it can't stay as it is. Should we put it under cleanup, Afd, or copyvio? --Spring Rubber 03:48, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * I would list it as a copyvio at this stage. Capitalistroadster 04:03, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Taken care of. I put this up for speedy delete-A3 and put the other one on copyvio. I guess that settles it. I just wonder how long the copyvio case will take with all of the backlog there. --Spring Rubber 04:36, 31 October 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.