Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Correo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Cirt (talk) 00:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)

Correo

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

NKreeger.com and correo-mail.org no longer exist, the Google Code project has no downloadables, and the last movement of the project is a low-0.x release two years ago. MikeHarris (talk) 23:43, 31 December 2009 (UTC)  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Timotheus Canens (talk) 02:24, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:51, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 02:41, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Strong delete. No secondary coverage, significant or otherwise. Heck, it doesn't even have primary sources. The google code page makes it look like this software never had any code written (no commits). Pcap ping  21:15, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - doesn't seem like there are hardly any active sources available for this, which makes determining and verifying notability nearly impossible.  Cocytus   [»talk«]  16:38, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete I really wish that any consumer product article that had no third party sources was a CSD criteria. Miami33139 (talk) 22:00, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.