Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corridor cricket


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was Delete, already in BJAODN, replaced with a redirect to Beach cricket. - Bobet 12:11, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Corridor cricket
I find it very well written and amusing, a high quality article, but either delete or userfy as an unverifiable personal essay containing original research about a non-notable subject. It was submitted to WP:PROP, but an anon contributor has removed its nomination there so I am submitting it here for consensus. The anon asked in an edit summary, "please keep this page alive!" I can report that it will be kept alive, as I have added it to BJAODN. RobertG &#9836; talk 09:09, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * This is splendid but I guess it has to go to BJAODN. --Bduke 09:31, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete there's nothing comedic, satirical or clever about this. MLA 09:54, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, of course, move to BJAODN if you like. Stephen Turner (Talk) 09:56, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * The information here should of course be Deleted, but I have heard of the term "Corrider Cricket," a form of cricket similar to Beach cricket. So I also suggest a Redirect.  D a Gizza Chat  &#169; 10:11, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per above; WP:NFT. --Muchness 10:20, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, send it BJAODN. --Ter e nce Ong 10:36, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Redirect per DaGizza. JPD (talk) 11:56, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete though it's great. &mdash; ciphergoth 17:18, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * BJAODN. Such a shame, this is a beautiful article. Actually, as DaGizza points out, the term is used, usually for the sort of casual five minute larking around type game played when things are slow at the office, with the waste basket as a wicket, and a rolled up newspaper and screwed up piece of paper as bat and ball. It probably does deserve a mention in that form in beach cricket 9with this redirecting) as he suggests. Grutness...wha?  23:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep This is an excellent article about a genuine game and the pure humour and wit simply add to the brilliance of the article. A great piece of work. DaGizza, you are a true icon for the typical office worker making their own amusements when work is boring. Great work.Albino Ibis 20:19, 24 February 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and BJAODN. Stifle 00:17, 28 February 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.