Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corruption in Haryana


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. postdlf (talk) 18:46, 3 July 2014 (UTC)

Corruption in Haryana

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Blatant soapbox, PROD removed by IP. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:47, 24 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete - per BsZ (as a Jasper Carrot fan your user name cracks me up every time!)  ukexpat (talk) 19:19, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Blatant violation of WP:NPOV, appears to be synthesis of sources in order to promote an agenda. -- Kinu  t/c 22:01, 24 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - per nom. Bali88 (talk) 00:39, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lists-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:56, 25 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per WP:SOAPBOX. RomanSpa (talk) 08:13, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge back to Corruption in India, of which this is a clear POV fork article. There's lots of useful information herein, but the article is so poorly written and formatted as to require invoking the TNT clause. Bearian (talk) 17:27, 26 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep I am creator of this page but I clear here that I have nothing to do with this page, I am not biased, not gaining popularity, not advertising, not wasting my time as people do when they play cards, if you keep it, you will know with study of references that topic is notable and further you may delete or merge, it will be discouraging for those who spend their time on Wikipedia, thanks for your heed.Rajsector3 (talk) 23:49, 29 June 2014 (UTC)
 * It isn't an issue with notability - the article in its current state is just not remotely up to encyclopedia style and quality, and is written in a blatantly attacking style. We just cannot say things like "candidates of Higher merit are left to reel in pain and live like animals" and "It can be easily imagined that what will be the conditions of the pupils taught be the ineligible teachers" in Wikipedia's voice! An article on this topic written in proper WP:NPOV Wikipedia style would probably be fine - but this article is not it. — Alan / Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:01, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, § FreeRangeFrog croak 06:16, 1 July 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep, most discussed topic in India including Haryana. GKCH (talk) 07:47, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Again, it is not the topic that is the problem - it is the current style and content of the article which is not acceptable. — Alan / Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:03, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - Nothing but WP:SOAP. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  15:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Request the words may be removed on objection raised.Rajsector3 (talk) 16:47, 1 July 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.