Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Corteva Agriscience


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:30, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Corteva Agriscience

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article's creator contested a PROD and recommended taking it to AfD. First, this article makes no attempt to assert the company's notability beyond it's basic near-future existence. More specifically, the notability requirements for companies state that "No company or organization is considered inherently notable" (no inherent notability) and "The organization or corporation itself must have been discussed in reliable independent sources for it to be considered notable" (no inherited notability). The "too soon" standard is also relevant because even after the company is created there is no guarantee that it will receive news coverage for some time to come. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 14:22, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 14:23, 16 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep I only created it as a redirect, but now that we're here: independent sources covering this globally major agricultural products company have been added to the article. UnitedStatesian (talk) 14:48, 16 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment: Found sources not used on the page already 1, 2. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and even more (many more through google). I have not checked all these sources for their suitability, but there are at least a good number which could be used. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 16:53, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note that 2 of these sources are from abc and Huffington Post and most other sources are from websites which seem to be reliable and independent. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 16:59, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per the number of sources above, it has got to pass the WP:GNG (And then also meet the notability guidelines). Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me &#124; my contributions 16:54, 17 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment from Nominator - The article has been expanded since the AfD so perhaps that motivated the article's creator. We can see if anyone still thinks the company is non-notable, but I have no disputes with the outcome of the AfD per the WP:HEYMANN standard. ---  DOOMSDAYER 520 (Talk&#124;Contribs) 18:46, 17 April 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.