Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cory Pike


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 16:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Cory Pike
Speady Delete non-notable YoungWebster 12:25, 26 April 2006 (UTC) Comment - Does not meet WP:BIO criteria; specifically, Political figures holding international, national or statewide/provincewide office or members of a national, state or provincial legislature. A junior wing of a party is non-notable --YoungWebster 12:51, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep delete Not big enough of a functionary in a notable party org. - CrazyRussian talk/contribs/email 12:43, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. What's the speedy criteria?  RGTraynor 15:33, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * comment the speedy criteria is that the article does not meet WP:BIO criteria --YoungWebster 16:05, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Not meeting WP:BIO is not, in and of itself, a criterion for speedy deletion. It's a perfectly legitimate criterion for AFD, but AFD and speedy aren't the same thing, and this article as it stands doesn't meet any criterion that would qualify it for speedy. Speedy, if you're still not clear, means an admin can zap it on sight without putting it to any kind of debate or discussion, so needless to say the criteria for that are pretty tight and even an obvious delete isn't necessarily a speedy delete. Bearcat 18:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete; Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and executives with a political party's youth wing don't particularly qualify as notable. Bearcat 17:56, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bearcat. Ardenn 18:15, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. NN. Deet 02:27, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per Bearcat. --Metropolitan90 02:29, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Pike's name and title absolutely merit mention on Endorsements for the Liberal Party of Canada leadership convention, 2006, and might just on Ken Dryden. No vote on the article yet. Samaritan 03:12, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete If endorsing Dryden is his biggest accomplishment then he doesn't belong. --JGGardiner 04:36, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Bearcat. HistoryBA 20:47, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Does not appear to meet WP:BIO.&#160;—  The KMan  talk  21:53, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.