Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cos Natola


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Courcelles 23:40, 16 August 2011 (UTC)

Cos Natola

 * – ( View AfD View log )

WP:N: Unable to find multiple, reliable secondary sources which provide in-depth coverage of this musician. I've been sorting through various primary, IMDB and retailer links but haven't seen coverage which would evidence notability under WP:GNG nor WP:MUSICBIO. Additional sources welcomed, as always. joe deckertalk to me 20:06, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete: The original author clearly wants the article to be deleted. The subject also appears to fail WP:MUSIC. Topher385 (talk) 18:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Do you think it qualifies as a G7? I don't usually handle or create speedies, but it seems plausible.  --joe deckertalk to me 19:06, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it would be reasonable to list it as CSD G7 as it seems to meet the qualitifations. Topher385 (talk) 20:08, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong / Speedy Delete: Agree with above. Jsharpminor (talk) 18:50, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Strong / Speedy Delete: Agree with above two entries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mondomodo (talk • contribs) 19:19, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment I've tagged it G7. --joe deckertalk to me 20:17, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I've declined the G7 tag. There are contributions from others besides the original author that are not insubstantial. This AfD will probably endorse deletion, but a CSD G7 is not appropriate.  Imzadi 1979  →   20:44, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I missed the additional contribution, but I believe you, and that's precisely why I asked for a second opinion. Cheers, --joe deckertalk to me 20:52, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 23:30, 10 August 2011 (UTC)

Original author only wants it deleted because he can make no sense of why some of you are questioning it's validity. The article is honest and accurate. It features no attempt to sell anything. It provides some proof thru various links etc...that the artist is in fact worthy of all the article speaks about. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mondomodo (talk • contribs) 00:36, 13 August 2011 (UTC)

thanks wiki, but i still think you have all missed the boat here....you feature a lovely article about canadian musician connie kaldor, who was beaten by cos natola in the 1982 "du maurier search for stars" - the equivalent of today's american and canadian "idol" shows.....anyway, whatever.....a talented individual gets axed from wiki for apparently no valid reason, as there was nothing slanderous or false in the entire article.....this artist has been featured on TV Guide, TV Week, The Vancouver Province, The Vancouver Sun, The Globe and Mail, IMDB....hello? is this not good enough for wiki????? as i said, whatever, and thanks again for trying to maintain your "standards", although in this case, you truly make no sense at all.....now i sincerely hope you go and sift through the hundreds (at least) of other articles you still maintain, which feature performers far less notable than cos natola — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mondomodo (talk • contribs) 02:31, 18 August 2011 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.