Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmic Extensionalism "X"


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 22:51, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Cosmic Extensionalism "X"

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Fails general notability guideline. Only one reliable source (HuffPost). This could be merged into Jack Armstrong (artist), who appears to be the only exponent of this art style. A Google search did not find any mainstream sources, and all the sources found that relate to Armstrong. The article has no incoming links or articles in other Wikipedia languages. Verbcatcher (talk) 14:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 14:58, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Note the article history:
 * Draft submission declined by
 * Moved to article space by, without significant changes
 * Replaced with a redirect by
 * Article reinstated by Kiboozle
 * The related article Cosmic Starship was recently PRODded by and deleted by . See also the related Articles for deletion/Cosmic Starcruiser. Verbcatcher (talk) 15:12, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


 * Delete - I let this one slip through the cracks back in 2018. Should have nominated it after the redirect was reverted. Searches under either "Cosmic Extensionalism" or "Cosmic X" turned up zero in-depth sourcing.  Only things were mentions in connection with the artist.  I would say redirect, but the current title is not a plausible search term, as it is never refered to as Cosmic Extensionalism "X". Those other two terms could be valid redirects.  I also don't think merge is a viable option in this case, as all the pertinent cited info is already included in the artist's article.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:31, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - A phrase coined and used exclusively by a single artist. There is no coverage of the term outside of mentions in articles on that artist, so it does not have the sources to pass the WP:GNG as a standalone article. And, as pointed out by onel5969, it would not be the appropriate term to use as a Redirect to the artist's page.  I have no objections to Redirects with the correct titles being created, though.  Rorshacma (talk) 15:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.