Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmic Fileserver


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete both. - Mailer Diablo 04:14, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

Cosmic Fileserver and Cosmic file server
The brain is not entirely a storage area of information, but more an antenna or conduit to a speculative location where memories and knowledge are kept. Original research. (Note. Originally tagged as copyvio but I accept the claim at Talk:Cosmic Fileserver that the uploader holds the copyright - who else would want to promote this idea?) -- RHaworth 21:38, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Note: I have nominated Cosmic file server for deletion and bundled the two AFDs. Since the content is almost identical and by the same author I assume the delete votes so far apply to it as well.  &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-10 02:33Z 


 * Comment I'm not sure if we want to consider this for deletion at the same time, but there is an essentially identical copy of this article that's already been around for a couple of weeks: Cosmic file server. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 21:56, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * delete totally OR. Brighterorange 22:15, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. OR. ManoaChild 22:32, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * And if this discussion is extended to Cosmic file server, delete that too. ManoaChild 22:39, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete as self-research. I was trying to get the guy to clean up Cosmic file server, but he never did. Does the Cosmic file server topic need to be nomintated and tagged distinctly? -- Mikeblas 23:13, 9 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete both as original research, unverifiable. &mdash;Quarl (talk) 2006-01-10 02:34Z 
 * Delete per WP:NOR Werdna648T/C\@ 10:17, 10 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, as everyone has mentioned, as OR. --PeruvianLlama(spit) 16:04, 10 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.